Die Leute, die versuchen, den König zu bewegen in die gegenwärtige Krise schlichtend einzugreifen, haben sich heute mit einem längeren Schriftsatz näher erklärt.
Den Schriftsatz gibt es zur Zeit nur in Englisch, ob und wann es eine deutsche Übersetzung geben wird, hängt von verschiedenen Faktoren ab.
Chavalit explains why he needs a royal audience
By The Nation - Published on April 23, 2010
Pheu Thai Party chairman Chavalit Yongchaiyudh yesterday issued a statement justifying the reasons behind his petition to seek audience with His Majesty the King.
On Tuesday, Chavalit petitioned to be granted a meeting with the King in his capacity as the main opposition party chairman. He wants His Majesty to prevent the government from using force to crack down on the red-shirt protesters.
In the first part of his statement, he raises nine points to argue that the monarchy is not above and beyond politics as many people believe. Here is a summary of his argument:
- Under the principles of international law, a monarch represents the country's sovereignty. In Thailand, the monarchy is the oldest and most powerful pillar of society, while the King exercises his discretion for royal initiatives and royal rulings in accordance with royal traditions.
- During the period of modernisation, Kings Rama IV, V, VI and VII safeguarded the country's independence in the face of colonisation. The monarchy nearly succeeded in introducing democracy but was interrupted by the 1932 revolution, resulting in an incomplete transformation into genuine democracy.
- Under Article 3 of the Constitution, the King exercises sovereign power via the Parliament, Government and Judiciary. In theory and reality, the dispensation of power is within the realm of politics. Therefore the monarchy is not above and beyond politics as understood.
- In the Thai experience, the monarchy has always guided the country to overcome turbulent situations and when deemed necessary, the King has the full power to exercise royal discretion. The King's intervention during the 1973 student uprising and the 1992 Black May incidents are examples of the monarchy's involvement in overcoming crises.
- The monarchy has been a counter-balancing force to check the runaway power of a dictatorship, be it military or parliamentary.
- The monarchy is just, and therefore, the only viable institution to mend social divisions.
- When the Democrat Party called for a royally bestowed government, His Majesty countered that the Constitution did not allow him to intervene in the formation of a government. Similarly, critics should not give him flak for seeking an audience with His Majesty until the monarch himself speaks on the subject.
- It is a long-established tradition that the monarchy will accept and review all petitions filed by citizens. Therefore, it is inappropriate to try and prevent a Thai citizen from having access to their King.
-The main reason for seeking an audience with His Majesty is concern over bloodshed. Under the government's order, about five to six soldiers lost their lives and more than 800 Thai citizens were injured. Yet the government appears undeterred by the casualties.
Therefore, he needs to seek His Majesty's benevolence to stop the tragedy.
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/hom...s-why-he-needs-a-royal-audience-30127729.html
